holesinthewall.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the holesinthewall.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host holesinthewall.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Automattic Inc .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

holes in the wall skip to content home about contact events and training reading list resources sound and vision students ← older posts june 14, 2018 · 3:20 pm cpv, who needs a definition? for as long as i have been working and thinking in this field, people have been talking about the problem that there is no official, agreed definition of child to parent violence (or whatever we are going to call it.) there are many and varied reasons why people have thought that having a definition might be quite a good idea. essentially these are to do with naming it as ‘a thing’, with parents recognising what they experience as abusive, with services being better able to respond, with the possibility of counting something if we name and define it, with the hope of developing policy and practice responses at strategic level. there were some raised eyebrows then at the recent n8prp conference on improving policing research and practice on child to parent violence and abuse, when it was suggested not once, but twice, that a definition might be more trouble than it was worth and we could do without one altogether! stick with me, and you can then decide for yourself whether the arguments made sense. first of all, why do we want a definition? i refer you to my earlier paragraph here, but also there was a lot of discussion on the day about the way that different services conceptualise cpv, which then goes on to drive the particular response of that agency. if, or as, different agencies have different mandates and policy frameworks, this can help explain why it can sometimes be difficult to have conversations across services. similarly, when people are doing research into the issue, they either start by choosing a definition, or even writing their own, to reflect what they want to study. would an official definition help with this, or would people still remain within their own conceptualisation and paradigm? if i haven’t lost you yet, it gets a bit more straightforward soon! i have been working in this area for a relatively short time – since 2005, and yet the knowledge and understanding has grown – and changed – significantly in that time. one of the problems of a fast moving world, it was argued, is that the definitions we have been using have been continually updated as new insights are learned. so, definitions of child to parent violence have expanded and evolved over time to include fathers as well as mothers, younger ages of children, different types of abuse, and more comprehensive impacts on the family. one obvious example is that the home office guidance document , published in 2015, refers to adolescent to parent violence and abuse, rather than also including younger ages. if we fix on a definition now, we may well be rewriting it in a year’s time as new information comes to light. this is, of course, not the only area of work to which this argument could apply. secondly, and following on, it was argued that by using a particular definition we risk closing off the response to some groups. so, for instance, if we adopt a particular age limit in a definition it might make it difficult for parents of younger children to access help early on. (arguably this issue of closing off help to particular groups happens at the moment any way because of where help is sometimes sited. back to the conceptualisation argument here?) rather than adopting a limiting definition, it was suggested that we should look at risk and harm, and work in response to those. (if it feels abusive to someone, then it is, perhaps.) hannah bows , who has done some impressive research into the abuse of older people, both within and without the family, proposed that it would make more sense to understand the issue within a life course narrative. this is not actually a new problem she argues, but the extension of an existing problem, and it makes more sense then to share understanding across the field, as we see how abuse of parents from younger children can extend into adulthood, and then on to old age. she argues that it is not age that is the defining factor in distinguishing aspects of domestic abuse, but other variables that need to be considered. following this argument, we would adopt one single definition for abuse within the family right across the life-course. child to parent violence would then be a ‘subset’ of this. (this is something i would like to return to at another time. or if anyone else would like to write something they would be very welcome!) plenty to think about there then – so, pick your jaws up off the floor, unscramble your brains, and let me know what you think! 2 comments filed under discussion tagged as abuse of parents , abuse within the family , adolescent to parent violence and abuse , child to parent violence and abuse , hannah bows , n8prp may 30, 2018 · 4:11 pm kinship care survey grandparents plus would like your help with their kinship care state of the nation survey. if you are involved in kinship care in the uk, whether recently or for the long haul, please do take ten minutes to complete the survey which you can find here . leave a comment filed under research tagged as grandparents plus , kinship care may 15, 2018 · 8:06 pm an evening with eddie gallagher eddie will be visiting london on 20th september and there is an opportunity to meet with him to talk about child to parent violence and the who’s in charge? programme, which he developed many years ago in australia. eddie will also have copies of his book, who’s in charge? why children abuse parents and what you can do about it, which is to be published at the end of this month. the evening is designed for trained wic? facilitators, commissioners, managers, and practitioners wanting to know more about cpv and the wic? programme. booking is essential for this event. please see the events and training page of this website for more information. leave a comment filed under announcements , training opportunities tagged as child to parent violence , cpv , eddie gallagher , who's in charge , wic? may 3, 2018 · 10:08 am child to parent violence: an uninvited guest an email to the rte radio 1 show, read out by ryan tubridy on 30th april, expressed a mother’s despair and sense of helplessness over her 9-year-old son’s behaviour towards her: “i wonder if it’s possible to admit that you can’t help your child … it’s extremely difficult to talk to people about it… you feel like you have failed your child… like it’s your fault, you’ve done something to create this.” despite assessments, medication, therapy, courses, and other support, the violence towards her continues and she feels as if there is nothing left she can do. reading the transcript from the show, it is easy to share the sense of helplessness. where do you turn when all the traditional methods have led nowhere? the email prompted a call to the show from madeleine connelly , senior social worker and family therapist. she highlighted the importance of parents feeling able to say they have come to the end of the road – without then being subject to shaming and judgemental responses. talking about the abuse; ‘pressing the pause button’ – choosing to respond to a crisis at a later moment; and finding a support network, were then described by her as powerful steps to take as reported by the parents themselves. finally, she stressed the importance of separating the behaviour from the child, with an expression much used in the practice of non-violent resistance – the child is not the problem – the problem is the problem. “what we do is encourage parents to see the behaviour as an uninvited guest or an infection, that it’s not the child, it’s a behaviour, to separate it out. the problem is the problem, it’s not the child, and that helps parents to look at different ways of seeing the problem and then working together with the child.” working together with the child to overcome the issues – since we should not assume the child is happy with the situation – and offerin

URL analysis for holesinthewall.co.uk

https://holesinthewall.co.uk/2018/05/30/kinship-care-survey/#respond
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/tag/uninvited-guest/
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/tag/abuse-within-the-family/
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/resources/
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/2018/03/12/transforming-the-response-to-domestic-abuse-hm-government-consultation/#more-4627
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/contact/
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/tag/grandparents-plus/
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/2018/05/03/child-to-parent-violence-an-uninvited-guest/#respond
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/2018/05/03/child-to-parent-violence-an-uninvited-guest/
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/tag/nicola-mcconnell/
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/category/radio-and-video/
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/tag/adolescent-to-parent-violence-and-abuse/
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/tag/child-to-parent-violence/
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/tag/carole-williams/
https://holesinthewall.co.uk/2018/05/15/an-evening-with-eddie-gallagher/
theopennest.co.uk
respect.uk.net
consult.justice.gov.uk
naotp.org.uk
nvrnorthampton.co.uk
kellycox.co.uk
safelives.org.uk
4children.org.uk
alternativerestoratives.co.uk
grandparentsplus.org.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Error for "holesinthewall.co.uk".

the WHOIS query quota for 2600:3c03:0000:0000:f03c:91ff:feae:779d has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 1710 seconds

WHOIS lookup made at 16:21:55 22-Jun-2018

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS holesinthewall.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

DOMAIN

  NAME holesinthewall.co.uk

NSERVER

  NS2.WORDPRESS.COM 198.181.117.9

  NS3.WORDPRESS.COM 192.0.74.9

  NS1.WORDPRESS.COM 198.181.116.9

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .